Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT03108079

Bladder Morphology Using 2 Different Catheter Designs

Bladder Morphology Using 2 Different Catheter Designs Foley Catheter vs. Cystosure Urinary Access System

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3 (estimated)
Sponsor
The Pelvic Floor Institute · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
21 Years – 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

Demonstrate and compare the 3D morphology of the bladder wall in full and drained states with 2 different kinds of bladder catheters in place. (Foley Catheter vs. Cystosure Catheter)

Detailed description

The Foley catheter has been the mainstay of bladder drainage for many decades. There has been little design change despite risks associated with Foley catheter use including cather associated Urinary Tract Infections(UTIs). However, recent incentives and penalties related to iatrogenic bladder infections have encouraged healthcare providers to search for ways to decrease catheter-associated infections. Data suggests that the design of the traditional Foley catheter may be responsible for bladder mucosal injury due to contact with the drainage tip, which in turn contribute to bladder infections associated with long term indwelling Foley catheter usage. The Cystosure catheter is an FDA approved bladder drainage device, with a shortened drainage port, designed to avoid contact with the bladder mucosa. It is postulated that the lack of contact with the mucosa would decrease mucosal injury, possibly leading to decreased incidence of catheter related bladder infections. Early sheep bladder microscopy studies have suggested that the Cystosure catheter produces significantly less mucosal injury compared to the Foley catheter following a short period of indwelling bladder catheterization. The present study is designed to compare bladder wall geometry around the drainage balloon in the Foley versus the Cystosure drainage catheters in living women. It is hypothesized that the "tip-less" cystosure catheter will have a smoother, more continuous bladder contour around the drainage port, compared to the traditional Foley catheter tip.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICECystosure Urinary Access System1. Demonstrate the 3D bladder wall anatomy with 300 cc of fluid infused with each of the following bladder drainage mechanisms 1. The traditional Foley catheter (Catheter A) 2. The novel FDA approved Cystosure catheter (Catheter B) 2. Compare the fluid flow pattern during bladder drainage for 1. The traditional Foley catheter (Catheter A) 2. The novel FDA approved Cystosure catheter (Catheter B) 3. Compare the 3D bladder wall anatomy after emptying the bladder with 1. The traditional Foley catheter (Catheter A) 2. The novel FDA approved Cystosure catheter (Catheter B)
DEVICEFoley Catheter1. Demonstrate the 3D bladder wall anatomy with 300 cc of fluid infused with each of the following bladder drainage mechanisms 1. The traditional Foley catheter (Catheter A) 2. The novel FDA approved Cystosure catheter (Catheter B) 2. Compare the fluid flow pattern during bladder drainage for 1. The traditional Foley catheter (Catheter A) 2. The novel FDA approved Cystosure catheter (Catheter B) 3. Compare the 3D bladder wall anatomy after emptying the bladder with 1. The traditional Foley catheter (Catheter A) 2. The novel FDA approved Cystosure catheter (Catheter B)

Timeline

Start date
2017-04-01
Primary completion
2017-05-01
Completion
2017-06-01
First posted
2017-04-11
Last updated
2017-04-12

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Regulatory

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03108079. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.