Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT03106454

Ovulation Incidence in Oral Contraceptive Users

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
58 (actual)
Sponsor
University of Southern California · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
18 Years – 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

Since the introduction of the combined hormonal contraceptive pill, dosages of ethinyl estradiol (EE) have steadily decreased from more than 150mcg to 20mcg in an attempt to improve the risk profile associated with the COC. In 2010, the Food and Drug Administration approved a oral contraceptive pill containing EE 10mcg/NET acetate 1mg (Tradename Lo loestrin). However, no studies have compared this formulation to pills containing either higher doses of estrogen or progestin alone. It is not known whether EE 10mcg is sufficient to prevent follicular development or to support the endometrium as well as higher doses of EE. This trial addresses the question of whether an oral contraceptive pill with EE 10mcg/Norethindrone acetate 1mg will better suppress ovulation or have a better side effect profile than a progestin only pill with a nearly equal dose of norethindrone.

Detailed description

Use of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) containing estrogen is associated with venous thromboembolic events. In an effort to decrease the risks of estrogen, the dose of ethinyl estradiol (EE) contained in combined oral contraceptive (COC) pills has decrease substantially from \>100mcg to 20mcg. In 2012, a COC with only 10mcg of EE (Tradename LoLoestrin) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration. However, no studies have compared this formulation to pills containing progestin alone to determine if this very low dose of EE decreases ovulation or improves unscheduled uterine bleeding beyond what is seen with a progestin only pill (POP). We aim to compare a COC with EE 10mcg/norethindrone (NET) acetate 1mg to a POP containing a nearly equal amount of progestin (norethindrone 1.05mg). The objective of the study is to compare the incidence of ovulation among users of a COC with only EE10mcg/NET acetate 1mg to users of a POP with a nearly identical progestin dose of NET 1.05mg. We plan to recruit 58 women between the ages of 18 and 45 years old, who are ovulatory at baseline based on serum progesterone levels. Subjects will be randomized to take either a COC containing EE 10mcg/NET acetate 1mg or a POP containing NET 1.05mg for one month. During the month of study treatment, we will measure ovulation incidence using a single serum progesterone levels of \>=4.0ng/dl, sperm penetration of cervical mucus using the Eggert Kruse classification system, pill compliance by NET serum levels, and side effects including unscheduled uterine bleeding via subject daily diaries. Our primary outcome, ovulation incidence, will be compared between study arms. Secondary outcomes will compare cervical mucus quality, sperm penetration of cervical mucus, side effects (including uterine bleeding), and pill compliance between users of these two pills.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGEthinyl Estradiol, Norethindrone acetate, ferrous fumarateCombination Oral Contraceptive Pill. Ethinyl Estradiol 10mcg/Norethindrone acetate 1mg/ferrous fumarate 75mg
DRUGNorethindroneNorethindrone 1.05mg

Timeline

Start date
2014-08-01
Primary completion
2024-01-01
Completion
2024-01-01
First posted
2017-04-10
Last updated
2025-12-26

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03106454. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.