Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03103334
A Bioavailability Study of Methotrexate 25 mg Administered by Needle Injection and a Pre Filled Needle-free Device in Healthy Volunteers.
A Single Center Single Dose Open-label Randomized Two Period Crossover Study to Determine the Bioavailability of Two Formulations of Methotrexate 25 mg Administered by Needle Injection and a Pre-filled Needle-free Device in at Least 48 Healthy Volunteers.
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 58 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Crossject · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 65 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
The objective is to determine whether the test product, Methotrexate 40 mg/mL solution for injection administered subcutaneously by the prefilled and needle-free delivery system Zeneo®, and the reference product, Methotrexate Biodim® 25 mg/mL, solution for injection administered subcutaneously by a conventional syringe with needle are bioequivalent.
Detailed description
ABSTRACT Objective: Zeneo1 is a needle-free injection device. We performed a pharmacokinetic study to investigate the bioequivalence of methotrexate administered subcutaneously using either the needle-free injection device or a conventional needle and syringe. Research design and methods: This was a single-dose, open-label, laboratory-blind, randomized crossover study performed in adult healthy volunteers. Each participant received two methotrexate injections (each 25mg), one via needle-free injection device and one via conventional injection, with a 21-28 day wash-out interval between dosing. For each participant, the administration site for both injections was either the abdomen or the thigh. Main outcome measures: The primary pharmacokinetic outcome parameters were AUC(0-t) and Cmax. Bioequivalence was assessed by standard criteria: whether 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios for the two administration methods were within 80-125%. Results: Fifty-two individuals completed the study. Bioequivalence criteria were met for AUC(0-t), for the overall analysis (both injection sites: 90% confidence interval: 99.4-103.1%), and for each injection site separately. Bioequivalence was similarly demonstrated with AUC(0-1). Bioequivalence criteria for Cmax were fulfilled for abdominal administration but not for the overall analysis. Injection via the needle- free injection device was well tolerated. Limitations: Limitations include conducting the study in healthy volunteers and the relatively small subject number (albeit satisfactory for bioequivalence). Conclusions: This study shows that methotrexate injection via needle-free injection device is bioequivalent to a conventional needle and syringe in relation to AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-1). Studies of needle-free injection device use in patients requiring methotrexate therapy are planned.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Zeneo® - Methotrexate | 0.625 mL of methotrexate solution 40 mg/ML for subcutaneous injection with a prefilled and needle-free delivery system |
| DRUG | Methotrexate Biodim® | 1 mL of methotrexate solution 25 mg/mL for subcutaneous injection with a conventional needle and syringe injection |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2014-06-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-09-01
- Completion
- 2014-12-01
- First posted
- 2017-04-06
- Last updated
- 2021-02-16
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03103334. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.