Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03097887
Omega Loop Gastric Bypass With And Without Anti-Reflux Sutures
Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Omega Loop Gastric Bypass With and Without Anti-reflux Sutures - a Pilot Study
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 100 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Medical University of Vienna · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 20 Years – 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This proposed trial is designed to answer the following questions: First, is biliary reflux to the distal esophagus present before OLGB and does it increase after the procedure? Second, does performing an OLGB with or without anti-reflux sutures make a difference in (biliary) reflux exposures of the distal esophagus? To answer these questions the investigators plan to perform a randomized, controlled trial involving two groups. Group A will undergo an OLGB without anti-reflux sutures and consists of 50 patients. Group B will receive an OLGB with anti-reflux sutures and also consists of 50 patients. Gastroscopic evaluation for inflammation and reflux will be performed before and one year after the operation utilizing multilevel intraluminal impedance pH-monitoring (MII-pH) and intragastric Bilitec 2000™. Furthermore, the study will be blinded to the patient. Long-term weight loss, the resolution of comorbidities and the incidence of surgical complications will serve as secondary endpoints. Follow-ups will be performed at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively to assess all primary and secondary goals.
Detailed description
Obesity, and especially its comorbidities, has unarguably become the number one threat to human health in the modern world. Western lifestyle leads to an increased prevalence and thus to a higher mortality (i.e. due to cardiovascular diseases). The positive effects of gastric bypass surgery on excess weight loss and comorbidity resolution are well-known. In contrast to the standard laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), a newer method, the laparoscopic Omega Loop Gastric Bypass (OLGB), has emerged over the past years. It is believed to be the simpler method involving only one anastomosis (instead of two) and therefore potentially reducing morbidity and mortality whilst maintaining comparable excess weight loss. However, since this new type of gastric bypass is similar to the former Billroth II resection (BII), the carcinoma risk is a concern. The OLGB is different from the BII resection in many ways. For instance, it involves creating an approximately 10 cm long narrow gastric pouch which could prevent the suspected underlying pathogenetic mechanism: biliary reflux to the gastric tube and subsequently to the esophagus. Biliary reflux is suspected to stimulate squamous esophageal cells and Barrett's epithelial cells to produce inflammatory mediators and therefore cause oxidative stress, DNA damage and apoptosis which might lead to adenocarcinoma. Worldwide, there are currently two different ways to perform an OLGB: with or without anti-reflux sutures, which involve sewing the biliopancreatic limb to the staple line of the pouch using V-Loc (non-absorbable) moving upwards as far as easily possible without creating any tension. This proposed trial is designed to answer the following questions: First, is biliary reflux to the distal esophagus present before OLGB and does it increase after the procedure? Second, does performing an OLGB with or without anti-reflux sutures make a difference in (biliary) reflux exposures of the distal esophagus?
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Omega Loop Gastric Bypass | Bariatric/metabolic surgical procedure |
| DEVICE | Bilitec 2000™ | The Bilitec 2000™ device will be used to measure the intensity of biliary reflux in the pouch. |
| DEVICE | V-Loc | Sewing device to perform the anti-reflux sutures. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2019-10-01
- Primary completion
- 2021-07-01
- Completion
- 2021-07-01
- First posted
- 2017-03-31
- Last updated
- 2020-09-02
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Austria
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03097887. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.