Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT03056716

Silastic Versus Conventional Drain in Thoracic Surgery

Silastic Versus Conventional Drain for Postoperative Drainage in Thoracic Surgery.

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
118 (actual)
Sponsor
T.C. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
16 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

In thoracic surgery, it is usual to place apical and basal drains for complete drainage of air and fluid out of the pleural cavity. The routinely used drains are mainly made of plastic. Recently silastic drains of smaller size are used without any complication. The investigators designed a prospective randomized trial to compare the draining properties of the two types of drains following various resections in thoracic surgery.

Detailed description

Following the Institutional Review Board permission (permission no: 2009/27) the investigators started to recruit patients for the study in June 2009. Pneumonectomy, decortication, and diaphragm plication patients were not included in this study. The patients were consecutively placed in one of the two groups. In Group I, an apical 28FR size CD, and a basal 19FR SD were placed following surgery. In Group II, the apical drain was 28FR, and the basal drain was 32FR CDs. Basal drains were removed out when daily serous fluid drainage became 200 ml or less, and the apical were removed 48-72 hours following the cessation of air leak. The patients were discharged on the day after drain removal. The data concerning gender, age, diagnosis, operation side, type of operation, amount of fluid drainage, duration of fluid and air drainage, length of hospital stay, and complications if any, were noted.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURESilastic vs conventional drain in thoracic surgeryApical drains will be identical in size and material, and the basal drains will be different in groups. The patients will be followed for daily amounts of fluid drainage, duration of air leaks and fluid drainage, and duration of hospitalization, and the results will be compared statistically to asses any possible relationships with the outcome and the type of basal drain used.

Timeline

Start date
2009-06-01
Primary completion
2012-06-01
Completion
2012-12-01
First posted
2017-02-17
Last updated
2017-02-20

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03056716. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.