NCT03037333

Analysis in the EMERGEncy Between TransVenous Cardiac PACIng Guided by Fluoroscopy Versus Echocardiogram

Prospective Analysis in the EMERGEncy Between TransVenous Cardiac PACIng Guided by Fluoroscopy Versus Echocardiogram

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 150 (estimated)
• Sponsor: University of Sao Paulo General Hospital · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

A lot of questions about use of temporary transvenous pacing still remain obscure and there is no effective comparison between use of fluoroscopy versus electrocardiogram/echocardiogram in patients with bradicardias. The aim of the study is to evaluate how long does it take to start the correct cardiac stimulation with transvenous pacing in patients with bradicardias comparing use of fluoroscopy versus electrocardiogram/echocardiogram and compare rates of complications between two methods.

Detailed description

Approximately 150 subjects will be recruited over a planned recruitment period of 18 months. Patients will be submitted to ecchocardiogram using Philips Envisor, and electrocardiogram with Philips Healthcare PageWriter TC30.

Conditions

• Bradycardia

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Transvenous cardiac pacing guided by fluoroscopy	Transvenous cardiac estimulation
PROCEDURE	Transvenous cardiac pacing guided by ECG/ECHO	Transvenous cardiac estimulation

Timeline

• Start date: 2017-08-16
• Primary completion: 2018-12-01
• Completion: 2019-08-01
• First posted: 2017-01-31
• Last updated: 2018-10-24

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Brazil