Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03023800
Effects of Macular Buckle Versus Vitrectomy on Macular Schisis and Macular Detachment in Highly Myopic Eyes
A Randomized, Open Label, Single Center Study Comparing the Efficacy of Macular Buckle Versus Vitrectomy + Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling + Gas Tamponade on Macular Schisis and Concurrent Macular Detachment in Eyes With Highly Myopia
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 80 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Macular schisis associated with macular detachment is a one of the complications of high myopia. There is controversy in the primary treatment for this situation. This study will compare the effects of macular buckling + gas injection versus vitrectomy + internal limiting membrane peeling + gas tamponade in a cohort of highly myopic eyes with macular retinal detachment associated with macular schisis.
Detailed description
A randomized, open label, single center study comparing the efficacy of macular muckle + gas injection versus internal limiting membrane peeling + gas tamponade on macular schisis associated with macular detachment in eyes with high myopia.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Macular buckling | Surgical procedures of macular buckling, drainage of aqueous fluid (0.1-0.2 ml) through limbal paracentesis, and inject gas ( C3F8 100%, 0.2ml-0.3ml) into vitreous body through pars plana, under systemic anesthesia. |
| PROCEDURE | Vitrectomy | Surgical procedures of small gauge vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peeling, and gas (C3F8, 14%) tamponage, under local or systemic anesthesia |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2015-04-01
- Primary completion
- 2017-01-30
- Completion
- 2017-10-12
- First posted
- 2017-01-18
- Last updated
- 2017-10-16
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03023800. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.