Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT03021369

Comparison of Two Different Pleural Drainage Systems

Vergleich Zweier Thoraxdrainage-Systeme in Der Herzchirurgie

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
374 (actual)
Sponsor
Kerckhoff Klinik · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The digital pleural drainage system Topaz+ by Medela is compared to the analogue system Atrium OCEAN by Maquet in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The study is prospectively randomized with an all-comer setup. The patients are randomly selected for one of the systems. The surgery is performed in the standard fashion and chest tubes are placed routinely by the surgeon depending on the type of surgery. A retrosternal 32 French drain is placed in every patient and pericardial and/or pleural drains are optional. The postoperative course does not vary from the clinical standard and the chest tubes are removed according to institutional standard. The clinical data about fluid amount, time of removal, air leaks, tamponade are routinely collected in a digital patient documentation system.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEPleural drainage systemPleural drainage system is connected to the chest tubes after surgery.

Timeline

Start date
2016-09-01
Primary completion
2017-12-01
Completion
2018-03-01
First posted
2017-01-13
Last updated
2020-02-25

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Germany

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03021369. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.