NCT03014388

Posterior Maxillary Ridge Augmentation With Sinus Lift Using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Autogenous Bone Graft

Posterior Maxillary Ridge Augmentation With Sinus Lift Using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Autogenous Bone Graft (A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparative Study)

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 20 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Cairo University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 50 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

Using growth factors obtained from patient's venous blood mixed with particulate autogenous bone the study compares bone gain by implant with gold standards in sinus Lift procedures for future implant insertion.

Detailed description

To study the effectiveness of MPM in ridge augmentation with implant insertion compared with autogenous bone graft. -PICO Population(P) : Patients with defective posterior maxillary alveolar ridge. Intervention (I) :Implant placement and ridge augmentation with MPM. Comparator (C) : Autogenous bone graft. Outcome (O) : Patient satisfaction - Implant stability.

Conditions

• Bone Resorption

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
OTHER	autogenous bone	Autogenous bone graft (gold standard). sinus lift with autogenous bone.
OTHER	Mineralized plasmatic matrix	By using venoud blood from the patient, together with bone graft, a centrifuge will be used to obtain the top layer after centrifuging blood at 3000 RPM.

Timeline

• Start date: 2017-01-01
• Primary completion: 2017-09-01
• Completion: 2017-10-01
• First posted: 2017-01-09
• Last updated: 2017-01-09