NCT03007069

Preimplant Site Augmentation Using MPM Versus Autogenous Bone Graft

Implant Insertion in Defective Anterior Maxillary Ridge Augmented Using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Autogenous Bone Graft

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 20 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Cairo University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 40 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

Using growth factors obtained from patient's venous blood mixed with particulate autogenous bone the study compares bone gain by implant with gold standards.

Detailed description

To study the effectiveness of MPM in ridge augmentation with implant insertion compared with autogenous bone graft. -PICO- Population (P): Patients with defective maxillary alveolar ridge requiring implant insertion. Intervention (I): Ridge augmentation with MPM. Comparator (C): Autogenous bone graft. Outcome (O): Patient satisfaction - Implant stability.

Conditions

• Bone Resorption

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
OTHER	Mineralized plasmatic matrix (MPM).	By using venoud blood from the patient, together with bone graft, a centrifuge will be used to obtain the top layer after centrifuging blood at 3000 RPM, for 10 minutes , Which will result if sticky bone graft consistency after mixing.
OTHER	Autogenous bone graft (gold standard).	Exposed implant threads are to be covered with autogenous bone and collagen membrane.

Timeline

• Start date: 2017-01-01
• Primary completion: 2017-09-01
• Completion: 2017-12-01
• First posted: 2017-01-02
• Last updated: 2017-01-02