Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT02996617
PEG-rhG-CSF in Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Receiving Chemotherapy to Prevent Neutropenia
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 240 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Shandong Provincial Hospital · Other Government
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Neutropenia is one of the most frequent adverse effects of chemotherapy, and the main factor to limit the dosage and the continuation of chemotherapy. The PEG-rhG-CSF has increased plasma half-life, and prolonged efficacy in compare with rhG-CSF. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of PEG-rhG-CSF in preventing neutropenia following chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Detailed description
Neutropenia is a common clinical complication of chemotherapy in cancer patients. It is an important factor that delays the course of standard treatments in patients. Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) is an effective drug for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. However, for patients with neutropenia, multiple rhG-CSF treatments are usually required. This is likely to extend the antitumor treatment period and increase physical and mental stress in patients. Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) is rhG-CSF chemically modified by a single methoxy polyethylene glycol group; it is able to alleviate neutropenia with a single dose. The aim of the present study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of preventive treatment with pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) on concurrent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and to provide a rational basis for its clinical application. Therefore, the investigators designed the multi-center, open-label,randomized controlled clinical study and aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between PEG-rhG-CSF and rhG-CSF in non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving chemotherapy.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | rhG-CSF regimen | Patients weren't preventive use of rhG-CSF.If their WBC≤1×10\^ 9/L,they were administered rhG-CSF:5ug/kg/day until their WBC≥4×10\^ 9/L.Chemotherapy regimen: CHOP: Epirubicin:70 mg/m2 , Cyclophosphamide:750 mg/m2, Vincristine: 1.4 mg/m2 , Prednison:100mg/d; CHOPE: Epirubicin:70 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide:750 mg/m2,Vincristine: 1.4 mg/m2,Prednison:100mg/d,Etoposide: 100 mg/(m2•d);EPOCH:etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin;Hyper-CVAD(A):hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine,doxorubicin, dexamethasone, cytarabine and methotrexate;GemOx-R:Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin;GDP:gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin |
| DRUG | Pegylated rhG-CSF regimen | Patients were administered pegylated rhG-CSF 6mg(weight≥45Kg)or 3mg(weight≤45Kg)once 24 hours after the end of chemotherapy drugs of every chemotherapy cycle.Chemotherapy regimen: CHOP: Epirubicin:70 mg/m2 , Cyclophosphamide:750 mg/m2, Vincristine: 1.4 mg/m2 , Prednison:100mg/d; CHOPE: Epirubicin:70 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide:750 mg/m2,Vincristine: 1.4 mg/m2,Prednison:100mg/d,Etoposide: 100 mg/(m2•d);EPOCH:etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin;Hyper-CVAD(A):hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine,doxorubicin, dexamethasone, cytarabine and methotrexate;GemOx-R:Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin;GDP:gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2016-11-01
- Primary completion
- 2018-11-01
- Completion
- 2018-12-01
- First posted
- 2016-12-19
- Last updated
- 2016-12-19
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02996617. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.