Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT02989805

Engaging Patients With Mental Disorders From the ED in Outpatient Care

Engaging Patients With Mental Disorders From the ED in Outpatient Care: A Comparative Effectiveness Workforce Study of Peer Specialist vs. Professional Care Managers

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
326 (actual)
Sponsor
Emory University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This study will compare the effectiveness of professional and peer care managers in improving linkage to and engagement in outpatient care after an emergency department (ED) discharge, as well as the mechanisms by which engagement occurs. The study will use a multi-site randomized trial study design across 8 EDs in South Carolina with telepsychiatry programs; each site will have one professional care manager (social worker or nurse) and one peer specialist care manager. Eligible subjects at each site will be randomized to a one-year treatment engagement intervention, the Coordination, Access, Referral and Evaluation (CARE) Program with either a peer or professional care manager, resulting in a total of 290 participants across sites. The CARE program will focus on shared decision-making between care managers and patients, and combines the traditional medical model of care management with a recovery-based approach.

Detailed description

Existing literature indicates that there is potential effectiveness of care management delivered by mental health professionals in improving treatment engagement and reducing inpatient readmissions and that certified peer specialists may be able to deliver an array of mental health services of similar or better quality as mental health professionals. However, there have been no studies comparing certified peer specialists to professionals in interventions to increase treatment engagement and reduce readmissions. This study will be the first to examine the potential benefits and tradeoffs between these two groups of providers. There is an urgent need to improve care transitions for patients with mental disorders seen in emergency departments (ED). Care management can improve treatment engagement after ED discharge for patients with mental disorders, and certified peer specialists hold promise in providing these services. However, there are no data comparing care management delivered by peers and professionals in these settings. With funding from a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) grant the study team will be able to implement a manualized care management program to improve follow-up and treatment engagement for patients in South Carolina, supported by preliminary data and experience from work previously conducted by the study team. The overall goal of the project is to compare the effectiveness of professional and peer care managers in improving linkage to and engagement in outpatient care after an ED discharge, as well as the mechanisms by which engagement occurs. The study will use a multi-site randomized trial study design across 8 EDs in South Carolina with telepsychiatry programs; each site will have one professional care manager (social worker or nurse) and one peer specialist care manager. Eligible subjects at each site will be randomized to a one-year treatment engagement intervention, namely the Coordination, Access, Referral and Evaluation (CARE) Program with either a peer or professional care manager, resulting in a total of 290 participants. The CARE program will focus on shared decision-making between care managers and patients, and combines the traditional medical model of care management with a recovery-based approach.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
BEHAVIORALCare ManagementProfessionals and peers will each deliver the same intervention. The intervention combines a traditional medical model of care management with a recovery-based approach.

Timeline

Start date
2017-04-03
Primary completion
2019-12-31
Completion
2019-12-31
First posted
2016-12-12
Last updated
2020-03-16
Results posted
2020-03-16

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02989805. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.