Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02968823
Licorice Versus Sugar-water Gargling for Pain in Patients Recovering From Ear-Nose-Throat and Maxilla-Facial Surgery
Licorice Versus Sugar-water Gargling for Pain in Patients Recovering From Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) and Maxilla-Facial Surgery - A Randomized, Double-blind Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 127 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Medical University of Vienna · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 12 Years – 99 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Our primary aim is to determine whether licorice gargling provides meaningful analgesia after oral surgery. Specifically, we propose to test the primary hypothesis that gargling with licorice solution reduces pain after oral surgery more than gargling with sugar water. Because effective analgesia can reduce pain and/or opioid consumption, we will jointly evaluate verbal response pain scores and overall morphine consumption considering licorice to be beneficial only if it proves non-inferior on both measures and superior on at least one.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Licorice | ExtractumLiquiritiaeFluidum, 1 g diluted in 30cc water, gargle the solution for 60 seconds without swallowing it starting preoperatively, 3 times a day until post-operative day 3 |
| OTHER | Sugar water | Sugar gargle: Sirupus Simplex (sugar 5 g) diluted in 30cc water, gargle the solution for 60 seconds without swallowing it starting preoperatively, 3 times a day until post-operative day 3 |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-07-01
- Primary completion
- 2022-09-30
- Completion
- 2022-09-30
- First posted
- 2016-11-21
- Last updated
- 2023-09-05
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Austria
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02968823. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.