Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT02968823

Licorice Versus Sugar-water Gargling for Pain in Patients Recovering From Ear-Nose-Throat and Maxilla-Facial Surgery

Licorice Versus Sugar-water Gargling for Pain in Patients Recovering From Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) and Maxilla-Facial Surgery - A Randomized, Double-blind Study

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
127 (actual)
Sponsor
Medical University of Vienna · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
12 Years – 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Our primary aim is to determine whether licorice gargling provides meaningful analgesia after oral surgery. Specifically, we propose to test the primary hypothesis that gargling with licorice solution reduces pain after oral surgery more than gargling with sugar water. Because effective analgesia can reduce pain and/or opioid consumption, we will jointly evaluate verbal response pain scores and overall morphine consumption considering licorice to be beneficial only if it proves non-inferior on both measures and superior on at least one.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERLicoriceExtractumLiquiritiaeFluidum, 1 g diluted in 30cc water, gargle the solution for 60 seconds without swallowing it starting preoperatively, 3 times a day until post-operative day 3
OTHERSugar waterSugar gargle: Sirupus Simplex (sugar 5 g) diluted in 30cc water, gargle the solution for 60 seconds without swallowing it starting preoperatively, 3 times a day until post-operative day 3

Timeline

Start date
2017-07-01
Primary completion
2022-09-30
Completion
2022-09-30
First posted
2016-11-21
Last updated
2023-09-05

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Austria

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02968823. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Licorice Versus Sugar-water Gargling for Pain in Patients Recovering From Ear-Nose-Throat and Maxilla-Facial Surgery (NCT02968823) · Clinical Trials Directory