Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT02941575
Patient Satisfaction and Peri-Implant Tissue Success of Hybrid Ceramic Versus E-Max Superstructures
Esthetic Patient Satisfaction and Peri-Implant Tissue Success of Crystal Ultra Hybrid Ceramic Compared to E-Max Superstructures in Esthetic Zone
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 22 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Cairo University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
In patients receiving implants in the esthetic zone, would the use of new Nano hybrid ceramic crown material (Crystal Ultra) improve esthetic patient satisfaction and peri-implant tissue success when compared with Lithium Disilicate crown (E-max)?
Detailed description
The patient will be treated in visits designated as follows: Visit 1: Preoperative records, face-to-face adherence reminder session, signing consents, clinical, radiographic examination and primary impression for diagnostic cast construction. Visit 2: (first stage surgery): implant placement surgical procedure and postoperative radiograph. Visit 3: After 3months (second stage surgery): re-opening of surgical site, placement of healing abutments and temporary crowns. Visit 4: After 2 weeks, removing of temporary restorations and taking of final impressions Visit 5: placement of different ceramic crown superstructures and recording different outcome values.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Crystal Ultra | Crystal Ultra: is a resin nano-ceramic material, that combines both advantages of ceramics and composites. |
| OTHER | All ceramic | IPS Emax: is an all ceramic crown that has proven superior aesthetics and strength properties. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2016-12-01
- Primary completion
- 2018-03-01
- Completion
- 2018-05-01
- First posted
- 2016-10-21
- Last updated
- 2016-10-21
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02941575. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.