Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02924805
Telemedical Versus Conventional Emergency Care of Hypertensive Emergencies
Telemedical Versus Conventional Emergency Care of Hypertensive Emergencies and Urgencies
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 331 (actual)
- Sponsor
- RWTH Aachen University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Comparison of telemedical prehospital emergency care and conventional on-scene physician based care of hypertensive emergencies and urgencies. The adherence to current Guidelines should be researched.
Detailed description
Telemedically guided cases of hypertensive emergencies (april 2014 - March 2015) and urgencies are compared with a historical control group of conventional emergency medical service physician care on-scene for these scenarios. The historical control group is a time period prior to implementation of the telemedicine system and after a research project with a precursor telemedicine system. No telemedical support but only conventional on-scene EMS physician care was available (November 2013 - March 2014).
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Telemedical care | Telemedically guided care based on a standard operating procedure |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2013-11-01
- Primary completion
- 2015-03-01
- Completion
- 2016-08-01
- First posted
- 2016-10-05
- Last updated
- 2016-10-05
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Germany
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02924805. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.