Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT02921230

Trial Comparing ELUVIA Versus Bare Metal Stent in Treatment of Superficial Femoral and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery

A Randomized Trial Comparing the ELUVIA Drug-eluting Stent Versus Bare Metal Self-expanding Nitinol Stents in the Treatment of Superficial Femoral and/or Proximal Popliteal Arteries

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
775 (actual)
Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation · Industry
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The EMINENT study is a prospective, multi-center study evaluating the effectiveness of the ELUVIA stent versus Self-Expanding Bare Nitinol Stents in the treatment of lesions in the femoropopliteal arteries.

Detailed description

The EMINENT study is a prospective, multi-center study evaluating the effectiveness of the ELUVIA stent versus Self-Expanding Bare Nitinol Stents in the treatment of lesions 30-210 mm long located in the femoropopliteal arteries in subjects with symptoms classified as Rutherford categories 2-4. The study is a 2:1 randomized (ELUVIA vs Self-Expanding Bare Nitinol Stents), controlled, single-blind, superiority trial (RCT). The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the ELUVIA Drug-Eluting Vascular Stent System (ELUVIA Stent) for treating Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery (PPA) lesions up to 210 mm in length when compared against bare metal stents, and collect additional data including health economics data.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEPeripheral stentingstent implantation during the index procedure

Timeline

Start date
2016-10-25
Primary completion
2021-07-02
Completion
2023-11-06
First posted
2016-10-03
Last updated
2025-02-24
Results posted
2024-10-28

Locations

60 sites across 10 countries: Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02921230. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.