Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT02902653
Efficacy and Safety of Hourly Titrated Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone and Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction
Efficacy and Safety of Hourly Titrated Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone and Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction: Randomized Clinical Trial
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 372 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Oihane Lapuente Ocamica · Other Government
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years – 55 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of the administration of oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone and vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Oral misoprostol | hourly titrated misoprostol |
| DRUG | Vaginal misoprostol | Administration of 25 microgs every 6 hours, maximum 150 microgr |
| DRUG | Vaginal dinoprostone | Vaginal delivery system of 10mg of dinoprostone |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2016-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2020-09-01
- Completion
- 2020-09-01
- First posted
- 2016-09-16
- Last updated
- 2018-02-12
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Spain
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02902653. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.