Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02872155
Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Oral Versus Intravenous Hydration as a Preventive Measure of Contrast-induced Nephropathy (CIN) in Patients With Renal Insufficiency (RI) Grade III Under Study Conducting Computed Tomography (CT)
Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Oral Versus Intravenous Hydration as a Preventive Measure of Contrast-induced Nephropathy (CIN) in Patients
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 264 (actual)
- Sponsor
- David Garcia Cinca · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 75 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study evaluates if oral hydratation is as effective as endovenous hydratation in the prophylaxis of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients renal insufficiency grade III under study conducting contrasted computed tomography.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Oral hydratation | 500 mL of water two hours before computed tomography and 2000 milliliters 24 hours after performing computed tomography |
| DRUG | Bicarbonate endovenous hydratation | Intravenous hydration: sodium (1.6 molar) Bicarbonate 3 mL / kg / h starting one hour before the computed tomography and sodium bicarbonate (1/6 M) 1 mL / kg / h during the hour after computed tomography. |
| DRUG | Saline endovenous hydratation | If there is contraindication for administration of bicarbonate the pattern of intravenous hydration is performed with saline solution: 3 ml / kg / h for 1 hour before the procedure and normal saline 1 mL / kg / hour for hour after computed tomography. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-07-04
- Primary completion
- 2019-07-15
- Completion
- 2019-07-15
- First posted
- 2016-08-19
- Last updated
- 2021-02-02
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Spain
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02872155. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.