NCT02803775

Paced And Sensed Electrical Delay in CRT Therapy (PASED CRT)

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 92 (actual)
• Sponsor: Deborah Heart and Lung Center · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a well established clinical therapy for patients with symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction and electrocardiographic QRS duration of 120 ms or greater. Multicenter trials have consistently demonstrated CRT "non responder" rates of 32-43% at 6 months. Subsequent studies have shown that utilizing echocardiographic-guided device reprogramming for optimal atrio-ventricular (A-V) and interventricular (VV) delays at rest have improved clinical response. Recently, an echocardiographically validated automated pacemaker programmer-based intra-cardiac electrogram (IEGM) algorithm has been developed for rapid optimization of sino-ventricular (P-V), A-V and V-V delays at resting heart rates that is partially based on the interventricular conduction time delays. Nevertheless, controversy still persists as to the applicability of both echocardiographic and IEGM derived algorithms at elevated heart rates, as with physical activity, when patients are more likely to experience symptoms related to poor cardiac output. Recent studies have shown clinical benefits of pacing from sites of late intrinsic activation or intra-ventricular conduction delays (IVCD). Some studies have utilized the intrinsic SENSED IVCD method while others used the right ventricle (RV)-PACED IVCD. There have not been any studies to date that compare both methods to determine if one may yield a better clinical outcome with lower non-responder rates. This study predicts that the RV paced IVCD method will provide better clinical outcomes than the longest RV sensed IVCD as determined by the clinical composite score. The study is a prospective double blind study with an additional cross-over group consisting only of non-responders to compare the clinical response in 72 patients receiving CRT therapy. After successful CRT-D implantation and before hospital discharge patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to Group 1 (SENSED) or Group 2 (PACED). The patient will complete a Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, compare echocardiographic data and be assessed by a blinded nurse and physician prior to discharge and at each follow up visit to maintain the double blind design. After 3 months of follow-up, non-responders from each group will be crossed-over to the other group and followed for an additional 3 months. Clinical data will be collected at the end of that 3 months and compared looking at changes in symptoms, ejection fraction (EF) and other echocardiographic measurements, New York Heart Assocation Function Class ( NYHA) class, clinical composite scores (CCC), device interrogation data and hospital admissions between the two groups to see if there is a statistical difference.

Conditions

• Congestive Heart Failure

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	CRT Algorithm	Programming based on Electrogram measurement

Timeline

• Start date: 2017-02-02
• Primary completion: 2019-02-04
• Completion: 2019-02-04
• First posted: 2016-06-17
• Last updated: 2019-09-26

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Regulatory

• FDA-regulated device study