NCT02798887

Ridge Preservation Comparing the Healing With or Without a Barrier Membrane

Ridge Preservation Comparing the Clinical and Histologic Healing of Membrane vs. no Membrane Approach to Grafting.

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 24 (actual)
• Sponsor: University of Louisville · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

Ridge Preservation Comparing the Clinical and Histologic Healing of Membrane vs. no Membrane Approach to Grafting.

Detailed description

Thirty patients will be treated using the principles of bone grafting for ridge preservation. Fifteen test patients will receive a flap technique with an intrasocket cancellous cortical particulate allograft plus a facial overlay graft using a bovine xenograft without a membrane where only the exposed intrasocket allograft will be covered with a piece of Alloderm GBR. The positive control group of fifteen patients will receive a flap technique with an intrasocket cancellous cortical particulate allograft plus a facial overlay graft using a bovine xenograft plus Alloderm GBR membrane. Approximately, four months post-surgery, a trephine core will be taken from the grafted site immediately prior to implant placement and submitted for histologic processing.

Conditions

• Jaw, Edentulous, Partially

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Ridge preservation	Ridge preservation comparing the clinical and histologic healing with or without a barrier membrane

Timeline

• Start date: 2016-08-24
• Primary completion: 2017-05-18
• Completion: 2017-05-18
• First posted: 2016-06-14
• Last updated: 2020-09-10

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States