Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT02769221
Intubation Success Rate_Rigid Video Stylet Vs Video Laryngoscope
Comparison of the Initial Intubation Success Rate Between Video Laryngoscope and Rigid Video Stylet in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 370 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 20 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study compare the intubation success rate between video laryngoscope and rigid video stylet in cervical spine surgery patients. Half of patients will receive endotracheal intubation by video laryngscope, other half of patients will receive endotracheal intubation by rigid video laryngoscope.
Detailed description
Video laryngoscope and lightwand are widely used at endotracheal intubation in cervical spine patients. Video laryngoscope is useful because of identification of anatomic structure around the oral cavity and vocal cord. Rigid video stylet resemble lightwand, but it has a video at the end of stylet. So rigid video stylet is useful at confirmation of vocal cord.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Rigid video stylet | |
| DEVICE | Video laryngoscope |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2016-06-01
- Primary completion
- 2017-06-01
- Completion
- 2018-06-01
- First posted
- 2016-05-11
- Last updated
- 2016-05-13
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02769221. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.