Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02741921
Conventional Double-lumen Tube vs VivaSight DL
Ability of Anesthesiologist to Placid a Double-lumen Tube. A Randomized Crossover Cadaver Study Comparing VivaSight DL and Conventional Double-lumen Tube
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 27 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Medical University of Warsaw · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The investigators sought to compare the time to intubation and success rate of the endotracheal intubation using standard double-lumen tube and video tube ETView DL in an adult cadaver model in normal and difficult airway conditions.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | VivaSight DL | intubation using VivaSight DL tube |
| DEVICE | conventional double-lumen tube | intubation using conventional double-lumen tube |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2015-11-01
- Primary completion
- 2016-03-01
- Completion
- 2016-03-01
- First posted
- 2016-04-18
- Last updated
- 2016-04-18
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Poland
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02741921. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.