Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT02701010

Behavioural Therapy Program for Female Overactive Bladder

Comparative Effectiveness of Three Different Teaching Methods in Behavioural Therapy Program for Female Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (actual)
Sponsor
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip Fakultesi · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Researchers aimed to identify the effectiveness of three methods of patient education for behavioral therapy (BT), including verbal instructions combined with a leaflet on a structured training program of BT, only verbal instructions on a structured training and only a leaflet on a structured BT training. Therefore, a randomized controlled trial was designed to compare effectiveness of those methods of patient education in BT based on the two validated patient- reported outcome measures (PROMs) for women with overactive bladder. Idiopathic overactive bladder (iOAB) symptoms in female patients are perceived as normal, which does not threaten life and not require to be treated immediately. It is necessary to raise the awareness of iOAB on women. The education and consultancy role of continence nurses is important in the treatment and care of urinary incontinence (UI) associated with iOAB. In the study, it was seen that the training to be provided to patients is helpful regardless of the teaching method used. Also it was found that the method of verbal instructions in the form of a structured training plus giving a leaflet to patient is the most effective method of BT for female iOAB.

Detailed description

Behavioural therapy (BT) is the first-line treatment for urinary incontinence including idiopathic overactive bladder (iOAB) syndrome. It requires education of the actively participated patient as well as time and effort from the clinician. However, the most effective method for patient education in BT remains unclear. Researchers designed a randomized controlled trial to compare effectiveness of 3 different methods of patient education in BT for women with overactive bladder. The sample of the study consisted of 60 iOAB female patients who applied to urogynecology clinic between November 2012 and April 2013. These patients were equally randomized into 4 groups of teaching models for BT. Group I included the patients educated by a continence nurse's verbal instructions in the form of a structured training including bladder training, bladder control strategies, pelvic floor muscle training and lifestyle changes and a leaflet containing information stated in structured training, group II included the patients taught by a continence nurse as the only verbal structured training, group III included the patients who were given only the leaflet and group IV was the control group consisted of female iOAB patients who were given an unstructured training by a healthcare worker with no specific experience in continence care.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
BEHAVIORALStructured training and leafletThe patients who were given both "explanatory verbal instructions of the educational leaflet on the structured behavioural therapy for iOAB" by continence nurse and the educational leaflet were included in this group.
BEHAVIORALStructured trainingThe patients who were given only "explanatory verbal instructions of the educational leaflet on the structured behavioural therapy" by continence nurse were included in this group.
BEHAVIORALLeafletThe patients who were given "only educational leaflet" were included in this group.
BEHAVIORALControl GroupPatients who were given unstructured explanations about continence care by a healthcare worker were included in control group.

Timeline

Start date
2012-11-01
Primary completion
2013-04-01
Completion
2013-05-01
First posted
2016-03-07
Last updated
2016-03-07

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02701010. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.