Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02657291
Costoclavicular vs Paracoracoid Approach to Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: a Feasibility Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 70 (actual)
- Sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Patients for upper limb surgeries who are candidates for infraclavicular block will be screened. Two techniques of infraclavicular block will be compared. Measured outcomes are performance times, block onset times, patient satisfaction, quality of block, and requirement for supplementary analgesia.
Detailed description
Infraclavicular brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance is used for surgeries on the upper limb. Traditionally, the block is performed at the lateral infraclavicular fossa where the cords are variable in position relative to the axillary artery. A recently introduced technique is the costoclavicular approach where the cords are viewed as relatively more superficial and clustered together compared to the traditional technique. Those meeting the inclusion criteria and will consent to participate in the study will be randomized to have either an infraclavicular block in the paracoracoid approach (Group 1) or an infraclavicular block in the costoclavicular approach (Group 2). All groups will have the same injectable volume (35 mls) and local anesthetic concentration (ropivacaine 0.5%). There will be 35 study patients for each group for a total of 70 patients.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Ropivacaine | Local anesthetic |
| DEVICE | Ultrasound | Ultrasound guided block |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2015-12-01
- Primary completion
- 2017-12-01
- Completion
- 2017-12-01
- First posted
- 2016-01-15
- Last updated
- 2021-01-20
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Canada
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02657291. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.