Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02625740
Ultrasound to Enhance Paclitaxel Uptake in Critical Limb Ischemia: the PACUS Trial
Use of Local Ultrasound to Enhance Local Paclitaxel Delivery Effect After Femoro-popliteal Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: the PACUS Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 56 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University of Rome Tor Vergata · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The PACUS Trial was a single center, single blinded, randomized trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravascular percutaneous catheter-delivered ultrasound energy to improve local Paclitaxel delivery effects in critical limb ischemia patients due to femoral-popliteal artery disease.
Detailed description
Study design The PACUS Trial was a single center, single blinded, randomized trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravascular percutaneous catheter-delivered high intensity, low-frequency ultrasound utilizing CardioProlific Genesis™ System to improve local paclitaxel delivery effect in patients with CLI due to femoral-popliteal calcific lesions and occlusions. The protocol was approved by a Local Review Boards and the Institutional Ethics Committee. All patients provided written informed consent before enrollment. The trial was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. Randomization Randomization occurred after successful crossing and pre-dilatation of the target lesion with a standard percutaneous angioplasty balloon without sub-intimal approach and/or flow limiting dissections. Patients were enrolled when a successful angiographic control was performed after PTA pre-dilatation. Subjects were randomly assigned by a computer-generated random sequence (2 blocks in a 1:1 ratio). Randomization was done in advance for all patients and without any stratification. The patients and physicians involved in the follow-up control were blinded to the treatment assignments through the completion of all 6 month follow-up evaluation. Operators were not blinded due to differences in treatment protocol. Twenty eight (28) patients were treated with an intravascular percutaneous catheter-delivered high intensity, low-frequency ultrasound and local Paclitaxel delivery with temporarily blood flow occlusion created by distal occlusion balloon (Study Group), and twenty eight (28) patients were treated with drug eluting balloon with conventional method (Control Group).
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Local exposition of target lesion to high intensity, low-frequency ultrasound | Target lesion was exposed to 60 seconds of high intensity, low-frequency ultrasound generated by the Genesis™ system ( CardioProlific Inc., Hayward, CA). The ultrasound catheter is removed after the exposition. |
| DEVICE | drug eluting ballon angioplasty | Target lesion was treated with an angioplasty, performed using the INPACT Admiral drug eluting ballon (Medtronic) |
| DEVICE | Flow occlusion with an angioplasty balloon | Inflation of a 2 cm long balloon catheter Admiral (Medtronic) , located distally to the treatment area, in order to obtain a flow cessation |
| DRUG | Local Paclitaxel infusion | Paclitaxel in a mixture with contrast medium at 1.0 µg/mm³ concentration was delivered to the treatment area for 60 seconds. The column of the Paclitaxel mixture filling the vessel was observed under the fluoroscopy and sustained during 60 seconds. The Paclitaxel /contrast medium mixture was then aspired with a 50 cc syringe and the distal balloon was deflated. |
| PROCEDURE | Angiographic control | A final angiographic control was performed with injection of 10 cc of contrast medium and compared with the pre-procedural one. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2013-11-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-11-01
- Completion
- 2015-11-01
- First posted
- 2015-12-09
- Last updated
- 2015-12-09
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02625740. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.