Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT02599285

Fixation of the Posterior Malleolus in Trimalleolar AO Weber C Fractures.

Operative Treatment of AO Weber C Fibular Fractures With Additional Medium-sized Posterior Malleolar Fragment: Syndesmotic Reduction and Functional Outcome After Syndesmotic Positioning Screws or Posterior Fragment Fixation. POSTFIX-C Trial: a Prospective Comparative Observational Study.

Status
Unknown
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
54 (estimated)
Sponsor
Medical Center Haaglanden · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

In AO Weber type C fractures, there is a combination of a proximal fibular fracture, a medial fracture or ruptured deltoid ligament, and a syndesmotic injury. Anatomical repair and reduction of the syndesmosis is essential to prevent diastasis in the ankle-joint. Widening and chronical instability of the syndesmosis is related to worse functional outcome and development of posttraumatic osteoarthritis in the ankle. There is limited biomechanical and clinical evidence that syndesmotic stability in AO Weber type C fractures with an additional posterior malleolar fracture can also be reached by fixation of the posterior malleolar fragment. Maybe, this is even superior to the usual treatment with syndesmotic positioning screws. Some authors concluded that stability of the syndesmosis in these fractures can be much more achieved by fixation of the posterior malleolar fragment than by placement of syndesmotic positioning screws alone. Another additional benefit of open reduction and fixation of the posterior malleolar fragment is that this will lead to an anatomical reconstruction of the syndesmosis. Although there is no current evidence, it is likely that a malreduction of the fibula in the tibial incisura will lead to a worse functional outcome on the long-term. No clear consensus in the literature is found as to which fragment size of the posterior malleolus should be internally fixed. The general opinion is that displaced fragments that involve more than 25% of the distal articular tibia should be fixed. Traditionally, reduction of these larger fragments is indirectly, followed by percutaneous screw fixation in anterior-posterior direction. Disadvantages are that it is hard to achieve an anatomical reduction, and that percutaneous fixation of smaller fragments is very difficult. Recently, a direct exposure of the posterior tibia via a posterolateral approach in prone position, followed by open reduction and fixation with screws in posterior-anterior direction or antiglide plate is advocated by several authors. This approach allows perfect visualization of the fracture, articular anatomical reduction, and strong fixation. Another advantage is that even small posterior fragments can be addressed. Several case series are published, which describe minimal major wound complications, good functional outcomes, and minimal need for reoperation.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEFixationFixation of the posterior malleolus with lag-screws or plate-fixation. If syndesmosis is intra-operatively stable, no syndesmotic positioning screws will be placed.
DEVICENO FixationPosterior malleolus will not be fixated. Syndesmotic positioning screws will be placed.

Timeline

Start date
2015-11-01
Primary completion
2022-12-01
First posted
2015-11-06
Last updated
2016-09-13

Locations

4 sites across 1 country: Netherlands

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02599285. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.