NCT02599051

Transobturator Verus Single Incision Slings

Transobturator Versus Single Incision Slings: 1 Year Results of a Randomized Control Trial

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 98 (actual)
• Sponsor: Cecilia Calvo · Academic / Other
• Sex: Female
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

A randomized control trial to compare the efficacy of the single incision mini-sling to the transobturator sling

Detailed description

Transobturator slings are one type of sling that has become standard treatment for stress urinary incontinence. However, this procedure involves a total of 3 incisions to perform. In contrast, single incision slings have been developed to treat stress urinary incontinence by using only one incision. However, to date the success and complications of these two procedures have not been compared or studied.

Conditions

• Urinary Incontinence, Stress

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	Mini-arc	We will place a single incision sling at the time of surgery for stress urinary incontinence
DEVICE	Monarc	We will place a transobturator sling at the time of surgery for stress urinary incontinence

Timeline

• Start date: 2008-11-01
• Primary completion: 2011-01-01
• Completion: 2011-01-01
• First posted: 2015-11-06
• Last updated: 2023-07-20
• Results posted: 2023-07-20