NCT02590666

Endometrial Polypectomy Performed With Bipolar Electrode Versapoint vs Microscissors or Graspers

Comparative Study of Endometrial Polypectomy Performed With Bipolar Electrode Versapoint vs Microscissors or Graspers

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 40 (estimated)
• Sponsor: University of Cagliari · Academic / Other
• Sex: Female
• Age: 18 Years – 60 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

Hysteroscopy today is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial polyps. Several hysteroscopic systems to resect endometrial polyps are currently available. Among Others bipolar systems and microscissors or graspers, both of theme make part of routine clinical practice and are universally accepted. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of bipolar resection energy polypectomy versus microscissors or graspers These procedures assume a lower cost and are associated with a lower surgical risk due to their realization without anesthesia . Hypothesis: Resection of polyps outpatient laser diode has a similar or superior to that of the bipolar electrode tolerability. The diode laser is a viable , quick , simple technique with a high percentage of resection and high degree of satisfaction of patients

Conditions

• Endometrial Polyps

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Bipolar Polypectomy	Polyps resection with bipolar electrode
PROCEDURE	Mechanical Polypectomy	Polyps resection with microscissors or graspers
DEVICE	Bipolar electrode	Bipolar electrode used to performs polypectomy
DEVICE	Microscissors or graspers	Mechanical instruments used to performs polypectomy

Timeline

• Start date: 2016-06-01
• Primary completion: 2017-06-01
• Completion: 2017-09-01
• First posted: 2015-10-29
• Last updated: 2016-03-09