NCT02589288

Adductor Canal Block: Continuous Infusion Versus Automatic Intermittent Bolus

Adductor Canal Block: Continuous Infusion Versus Automatic Intermittent Bolus For Postoperative Analgesia After Day-Case Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 80 (actual)
• Sponsor: ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The aim of this prospective, randomized , blinded study is to compare two different infusion techniques (continuous VS intermittent automatic bolus) to assess the effects of postoperative analgesia after Day-Case anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Conditions

• Injury of Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Continuous Infusion of ropivacaine 0.2%	Postoperative continuous infusion of Ropivacaine 0,2% at 6 ml/h and 4 ml PCA bolus, lockout 20 minutes via electronic infusion pump (Micrel device, Greece).
PROCEDURE	Automatic Intermittent Bolus of ropivacaine 0.2%	Postoperative Automatic Intermittent Bolus of 6 ml Ropivacaine 0,2% every hour and 4 ml PCA bolus, lockout 20 minutes via electronic infusion pump (Micrel device, Greece).

Timeline

• Start date: 2015-11-01
• Primary completion: 2016-12-01
• Completion: 2017-03-01
• First posted: 2015-10-28
• Last updated: 2017-08-14

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Italy