Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT02581540

Mersey Acute Coronary Syndrome Rule-Out Using High Sensitive Troponin

Mersey Acute Coronary Syndrome Rule-Out Using High Sensitive Troponin (MACROS) : A Comparison of Risk Scores in Consecutive, Unselected Chest Pain Presentations With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Era of High Sensitive Troponin

Status
Completed
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
3,054 (actual)
Sponsor
Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · Other Government
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The aim of this observational study is twofold. The primary hypothesis being tested is that initial(first) high sensitivity Tn \<5ng/l (limit of detection) combined with an ECG with no ischaemic changes is superior as an accelerated diagnostic tool/strategy compared to TIMI score (\<2), GRACE \<75 and HEART score ≤ 3. (Hs tn T- Roche elecsys HS tn T) and also against HS troponin at the 99th percentile (\<15ng/l with nonischaemic changes)- again all scored with initial (first tn ) only. The second aim is to directly compare the three established methods of risk stratifying patients (predicting risk in suspected heart attacks) namely, the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE), Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and HEART score in the era of high sensitivity troponins performs best.

Detailed description

Chest pain results in up to 9.4% of presentations to emergency departments in the UK and up to 27.4% of hospital admissions. The morbidity, mortality and economic costs associated with this constitute a significant burden on the National Health Service (NHS). Distinguishing patients with serious and potentially life-threatening causes of chest pain from those with 'benign' causes is important but often difficult. There are numerous risk stratification scores available for estimating risk in patients with heart attacks but these have not been widely applied or tested in those presenting to accident and emergency department with chest pain when the diagnosis of a heart attack has not yet been established but is suspected. These tools were based on conventional Troponin assays. The advent of the new Elecsys highly-sensitive (HS) Troponin T assays has led to improved and earlier detection of heart attacks. high sensitivity refers to analytic sensitivity - much lower concentrations of troponin can be identified in the blood. The aim of this prospective observational cohort study is twofold. Firstly to determine whether the results of a single high sensitivity troponin and electrocardiogram (ECG) could be used alone to direct care (expedite early discharge in those ECG and troponin negative). A discharge strategy of high sensitive troponin (\<5ng/l) with a nonsichaemic ECG will be directly compared to the following: hs troponin at or below the 99th percentile (\<15ng/l) + a nonischaemic ECG, TIMI score \<2, HEART score ≤ 3 and GRACE score \<75. Secondly we wish to determine which of the three established methods of risk stratifying patients (predicting risk in suspected heart attacks) namely, the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE), Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and HEART score in the era of HS troponin T performs best. Patients presenting to the emergency department at Aintree University Hospital, Merseyside between June 2011 and October 2011 with suspected cardiac chest pain are prospectively recruited and information entered into an electronic database. The study comprises of 1750 consecutive patients (3056 with chest pain but only 1750 with suspected cardiac chest pain). All data collated will form the basis for risk stratification scores (GRACE, TIMI, HEART) calculation. These risk scores will give a predicted event rate (death, heart attack, stenting procedure or bypass). The main outcome measures are major adverse cardiac events(MACE)- death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and emergency revascularisation at 6 weeks, and 1 year. the outcomes will be blinded (to initial risk scores) and independently adjudicated by consultant cardiologists with a 3rd consultant cardiologist experienced in clinical endpoint adjudication used to resolve differences.

Conditions

Timeline

Start date
2011-06-01
Primary completion
2016-07-01
Completion
2016-07-01
First posted
2015-10-21
Last updated
2021-09-09

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02581540. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.