Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT02572804
Comparing Rectus Sheath Catheter to Epidural Post Cystectomy
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Versus Surgically Placed Rectus Sheath Catheters for Open Radical Cystectomy: Is There a Difference in Patient Outcomes?
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 160 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Vancouver Coastal Health · Other Government
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 19 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This is a prospective randomised controlled trial that will compare the outcomes of rectus sheath catheters to epidurals in patients who have undergone a cystectomy, via a lower midline abdominal incision for bladder cancer.
Detailed description
This study will compare the outcomes of two different pain control techniques, used as standard of care, following major abdominal surgery for bladder removal. Rectus sheath catheters are small tubes that are positioned into a specific area of the cut abdominal wall at the end of surgery; whereas an epidural is a tube that is positioned into the back. Both allow administration of local anaesthetic for pain control. The current gold standard is an epidural. This study will aim to evaluate this and show the comparative efficacy of the rectus sheath catheter, which anecdotally the investigators have found superior in practice.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Epidural | Patients in this group will have an epidural inserted in a standard fashion, prior to the induction of anesthesia. These will be infused with 0.125% Bupivicaine at an initial rate of 5mls/hour, titrated to response. Patients will also receive a patient controlled analgesia with hydromorphone 0.2mg/ml, bolus of 200 micrograms with 6 minute lock out (variable in accordance with anesthetic preference). |
| DEVICE | Rectus Sheath Catheters | Patients in this group will have surgically inserted rectus sheath catheters (bilaterally), immediately prior to closure of the anterior abdominal wall. These will be infused with 0.125% Bupivicaine at 5mls an hour at a standard rate.Patients will also receive a patient controlled analgesia with hydromorphone 0.2mg/ml, bolus of 200 micrograms with 6 minute lock out (variable in accordance with anesthetic preference). |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2015-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2016-12-01
- Completion
- 2017-06-01
- First posted
- 2015-10-09
- Last updated
- 2016-11-02
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Canada
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02572804. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.