Trials / No Longer Available
No Longer AvailableNCT02564224
Study Comparing Pursestring Wound Closure vs Conventional Closure to Reverse Stoma of Colorectal Cancer Patients
Randomized Clinical Trial of Stoma Reversal Comparing Pursestring Wound Closure vs Conventional Closure to Eliminate the VSS Score of the Scar for Colorectal Cancer Patients
- Status
- No Longer Available
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Expanded Access
- Enrollment
- —
- Sponsor
- Zhejiang University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Temporary stomas has been performed to reduce complications after colorectal cancer surgery, especially in high-risk anastomosis. Different closure technics showed different outcome. The aim of this study is to compare the scar length , surgical site infection and pain score of purse-string wound closure vs conventional closure.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Pursestring Wound Closure | Procedure: Pursestring Wound Closure |
| PROCEDURE | Conventional Wound Closure | Procedure: Conventional Wound Closure |
| DEVICE | prolene |
Timeline
- First posted
- 2015-09-30
- Last updated
- 2018-06-06
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02564224. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.