Trials / Withdrawn
WithdrawnNCT02479672
Comparison of the VividTrac® Videolaryngoscope to Direct Laryngoscopy in Adults Under Manual Inline Stabilization
- Status
- Withdrawn
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 0 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Loma Linda University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This is a prospective randomized clinical study to be performed in adult patients ages 18 and older who are undergoing surgical procedures requiring endotracheal intubation. Adult patients will be randomized to either the VideoTrac® laryngoscope or direct laryngoscopy and the time to intubation will be compared and recorded. Patients in both treatment arms will receive manual inline stabilization. The study hypothesis is that the time to endotracheal intubation will be decreased in the VividTrac® video laryngoscope group when compared to direct laryngoscopy.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | laryngoscopy | Placement of endotracheal tube. If successful intubation does not occur after the first attempt at laryngoscopy, airway equipment used in further attempts will be selected at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. |
| PROCEDURE | Manual Inline Stabilization | Manual immobilization of Patient's neck with intention to minimize movement from baseline position |
| DEVICE | VividTrac® |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2016-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2016-07-01
- Completion
- 2016-07-01
- First posted
- 2015-06-24
- Last updated
- 2016-10-12
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02479672. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.