Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02433119
The Efficacy and Safety of OROSARTAN® Versus CODIOVAN® in Patients With Essential Hypertension Uncontrolled With Monotherapy
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Phase IV Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of OROSARTAN® Tablet 5/160mg Versus CODIOVAN® Tablet 160/12.5mg in Patients With Essential Hypertension Uncontrolled With Valsartan 160mg Monotherapy
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 238 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Dong-A ST Co., Ltd. · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 19 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
A multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase IV clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of OROSARTAN® tablet 5/160mg versus CODIOVAN® tablet 160/12.5mg in patients with essential hypertension uncontrolled with valsartan 160mg monotherapy
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | OROSARTAN® 5/160mg | |
| DRUG | CODIOVAN® 160/12.5mg |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2015-03-16
- Primary completion
- 2016-09-08
- Completion
- 2016-09-08
- First posted
- 2015-05-04
- Last updated
- 2017-04-12
Locations
1 site across 1 country: South Korea
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02433119. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.