Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT02417857

Comparison of Single İncision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Quality-of-life, Body Image and Cosmesis After Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CLC)

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
58 (actual)
Sponsor
Ankara Mevki Military Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of quality-of-life measures and evaluate the body image and cosmesis between Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) and Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CLC).Twenty eight patients underwent SILC and 30 underwent LC.Fifty-eight patients were included the study and divided into two groups. The results of the questionnaires were statistically compared.

Detailed description

Recently, single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is one of the minimally invasive technique, developed to reduce the need of multiple ports and has become popular among the surgeons. This study was conducted with fifty eight patients between January 2011 and March 2013 in Turkey. Fifty-eight patients were included the study and divided into two groups. Quality-of-life measures was evaluated by the EuroQol EQ-5D questionnaire.Cosmesis and body image were evaluated with the Body Image Questionnaire. All statistical analyses were performed by IBM Statistics 21.0 and MS-Excel 2007. A value of p\<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURELaparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Single Incision)We performed Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) operation to the group-1
PROCEDURELaparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Conventional)We performed Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CLC) to group-2

Timeline

Start date
2011-01-01
Primary completion
2013-03-01
Completion
2014-03-01
First posted
2015-04-16
Last updated
2015-04-16

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02417857. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.