NCT02411422

Comparison of Efficiency Between I-gel Blind Intubation and I-gel Bronchoscopic Intubation During Resuscitation

Comparison of Efficiency Between I-gel-Assisted Blind Intubation and I-gel-assisted Bronchoscopic Intubation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Randomized Simulation Study

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 23 (actual)
• Sponsor: Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The investigators will compare conventional intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope, blind endotracheal intubation using i-gel for conduit and bronchoscopic intubation using Ambu-aScope and i-gel. All situation assumed as cardiac arrest. i.e, someone give chest compressions continuously without interruption. Moreover the investigators will compare the type of endotracheal tube. Reinforced tube has more soft tube tip, so the investigators think it is more acceptable for intubation using i-gel as conduit.

Conditions

• Heart Arrest

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	Conventional endotracheal tube	Conventional endotracheal tube
DEVICE	Reinforced endotracheal tube	Reinforced endotracheal tube

Timeline

• Start date: 2015-04-01
• Primary completion: 2015-04-01
• Completion: 2015-04-01
• First posted: 2015-04-08
• Last updated: 2015-04-14

Locations

1 site across 1 country: South Korea