NCT02402621

Comparison Between Conventional and Model-based Infusion Strategy of IV PCA in Patients Undergoing RALP

Comparison Between Conventional and Model-based Infusion Strategy of Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 111 (actual)
• Sponsor: Asan Medical Center · Academic / Other
• Sex: Male
• Age: 20 Years – 69 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Comparing postoperative analgesics requirements and complications between conventional and model-based infusion strategy of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in patients who undergoing robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Group A: conventional intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, Group B: model-based infusion strategy of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia

Detailed description

The investigators compared postoperative analgesics requirements and complications between conventional and model-based infusion strategy of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) in patients who undergoing robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) Group A: conventional IV PCA, Group B: model based IV PCA 1. Primary endpoint: comparison of postoperative analgesic requirements in patient undergoing robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) between conventional patient controlled analgesia (PCA) (Group A) and effective-compartment based dosing strategy of PCA (Group B) 2. Secondary endpoint: 1) VAS analysis between two groups, 2) postoperative nausea and vomiting analysis between two groups, 3) complication evaluation between two groups

Conditions

• Prostate Cancer

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DRUG	fentanyl	fentanyl with antiemetic drug

Timeline

• Start date: 2015-04-01
• Primary completion: 2015-09-01
• Completion: 2015-09-01
• First posted: 2015-03-30
• Last updated: 2015-12-02

Locations

1 site across 1 country: South Korea