NCT02402582

Effect of Family-Centered Empowerment Model

Family-Centered Empowerment Model With Four-stage Including Perceived Threat With Group Discussion Method, Self-efficacy With Problem Solving Method, Self-esteem With Educational Partnership, and Outcome and Process Evaluations

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 70 (actual)
• Sponsor: Baqiyatallah Medical Sciences University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 85 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a FCEM-focused hybrid CR program for survivors of myocardial infarction (MI). The study sought to compare the long-term impact of FCEM-based intervention with a standard CR program in terms of mortality rates and different aspects of health related quality of life (HRQoL), which includes soft outcomes such as levels of stress, anxiety, psychological distress, quality of life (QoL), and hard outcomes such as the percentage of ejection fraction (EF), independent functioning, and functional exercise capacity status.

Detailed description

The investigators conducted a triple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial study in patients admitted for MI to the CCU of an academic teaching hospital from June 2012 to January 2023. The study was approved by the institutional investigative review board at Tarbiat Modares University and Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences. Patients were block randomized to receive either standard home cardiac rehabilitation (CR) or CR using the Family-centered Empowerment Model (FCEM) strategy. Patients had not previously gone through CR programs. The difference between the two groups was not disclosed at any point. Patients consented knowing that they would receive cardiac rehabilitation, but without knowing the details. Patients and their designated family/friend were enrolled as a 'unit'. Patient empowerment was measured with FCEM questionnaires pre-intervention and post-intervention for a total of 9 assessments. Quality-of-life, perceived stress, state and trait anxiety, psychological distress, independent functioning, and functional exercise capacity status were assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the 14-item Perceived Stress, the 20-item State and 20-item Trait Anxiety questionnaires, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale,Barthel Index (BI) activities of daily living index, six-minute walk test (6MWT), and free walking index (FWI), respectively. In addition, echocardiography was used to measure ejection fraction.

Conditions

• Acute Myocardial Infarction: Rehabilitation Phase

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
OTHER	Family-centered empowerment model	FCEM and Control groups had similar inpatient care. Patients in the intervention group received care employing the FCEM in four stages. Stage 1: Awareness and cognition. During 3-5 group sessions they were evaluated for their insight into their perceived illness severity and perceived sensitivity, or the degree to which they felt threatened by their illness. Stage 2: Expectations. 3-5 sessions. Stage 3: Acceptance. Assessed using an educational participation method in group discussion. Stage 4: Formative summative evaluations. The formative evaluation encourages patients to internalize their locus of control by seeing his/her self-empowerment (increasing self-responsibility about their health). Summative evaluations were performed to evaluate the influence of the intervention on HRQoL dimensions, perceived stress and anxiety -- assessed at baseline and at 3 months post-intervention. Empowerment was measured at baseline and at 10 days post-intervention by deploying FCEM questionnaires.
OTHER	Control	FCEM and Control groups had similar inpatient care. Upon discharge the Control group underwent routine care and follow-up.

Timeline

• Start date: 2012-06-01
• Primary completion: 2015-01-01
• Completion: 2023-01-01
• First posted: 2015-03-30
• Last updated: 2023-06-06