Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT02396940
3D HD Versus 2D HD in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Three-dimensional High-definition (3DHD) Laparoscopy Versus Two-dimensional High-definition (2DHD) Laparoscopy in Inguinal Hernia Repair.
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 30 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Herlev Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 85 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
The aim of this study is to compare 3D-laparoscopy versus 2D-laparoscopy with the use of HD resolution in inguinal hernia repair in terms of error rating, performance time and subjective assessment.
Detailed description
Experimental studies have shown that even experienced surgeons gain from stereoscopy when solving both easy and complex tasks. Inguinal hernia repair is a specialist operation and the large flow makes this type of operation suitable for exploring any advantage of three-dimensional laparoscopy for the experienced surgeon.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | 3D HD laparoscopy | Olympus 3D laparoscopy ENDOEYE FLEX in high definition with the use of passive, polarizing glasses. |
| DEVICE | 2D HD laparoscopy | Placebo |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2015-03-01
- Primary completion
- 2018-12-01
- Completion
- 2018-12-01
- First posted
- 2015-03-24
- Last updated
- 2018-03-02
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Denmark
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02396940. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.