Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02396836
Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of 6 Versus 3 Steps for Hand Hygiene
Randomised Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Two Hand Hygiene Techniques Using Alcohol Based Hand Rub on Hand Surface Coverage and Reducing Bacterial Hand Contamination
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 120 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Glasgow Caledonian University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The aim is to compare the effectiveness of the 6 step hand rub technique versus 3 step hand rub technique in hand coverage and in reducing bacterial contamination on the hands of healthcare workers in practice. Research questions 1. What is the effectiveness of the 6 step technique in hand coverage compared to the 3 step technique? 1. What are the most frequently missed sites in hand surface coverage using 6 steps compared to 3 steps? 2. What is the reduction in bacterial contamination of the hand with the 6 step compared to the 3 step technique? 2. Does site missed or coverage relate to bacterial load? 3. What is the time taken for 6 step technique versus 3 step technique?
Detailed description
The 6 step for decontamination of healthcare workers hand is recommended by the World Health Organization but the 3 step technique is easy to perform and has been shown by some studies to be effective. Compliance with the 6 step technique is not optimum. If the 3 step was more as or more effective than the 6 step compliance with it could be compared with that for the 6 step. No randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of these two techniques using alcohol based hand rub has been conducted.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | 6 step technique | Hand decontamination with alcohol hand rub using the World Health Organizations 6 step technique |
| OTHER | 3 step technique | Hand decontamination with alcohol hand rub using the 3 step technique |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2013-11-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-03-01
- Completion
- 2014-03-01
- First posted
- 2015-03-24
- Last updated
- 2015-03-24
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United Kingdom
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02396836. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.