Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT02395419
A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Airtraq Laryngoscope in Routine Airway Management
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 48 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Manuel Ángel Gómez-Ríos · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 100 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Endotracheal intubation is usually required to allow unrestricted surgical approach. The Macintosh laryngoscope is the standard method. However in certain situations as difficult airway this technique is ineffective and poorly tolerated by the patient. Fiberoptic intubation is the gold standard in this scenario, however sometimes it is not possible due to failure or unavailability, so alternatives are needed. The TotalTrack (MedComflow SA, Barcelona, Spain) and the Airtraq (Prodol Meditec, Vizcaya, España) been designed specifically for the airway management. However, despite their use in clinical practice, there are no comparative studies.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Orotracheal intubation with Totaltrack | |
| DEVICE | Orotracheal intubation with Airtraq |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2016-10-01
- Primary completion
- 2017-11-01
- First posted
- 2015-03-23
- Last updated
- 2016-10-17
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Spain
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02395419. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.