Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02393989
Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of Bonded Posterior Restorations: Amalgam vs Resin Composite
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 50 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Ege University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
Background: This 3-year clinical trial compared the performance and post-operative sensitivity of a posterior resin composite with that of bonded-amalgam in large sized cavities. Additionally, it was evaluated whether resin composite could be an alternative for bonded amalgam. Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial. Patients in need of at least two posterior restorations were recruited. Authors randomly assigned one half of the restorations to receive bonded-amalgam and the other half to composite restorations. Forty bonded-amalgams and composites were evaluated for their performance on modified Ryge criteria and post-operative sensitivity using VAS for 36-months.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | posterior restoration | restorations for caries effected teeth |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2013-01-01
- Completion
- 2013-01-01
- First posted
- 2015-03-20
- Last updated
- 2015-03-20
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02393989. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.