Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT02380768

A Comparison of the Ambu AuraGain Versus LMA Supreme in Children

A Randomized Comparison of the Ambu AuraGain™ and LMA Supreme™ in Infants and Children

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100 (actual)
Sponsor
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
3 Months – 6 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a clinically relevant difference in airway leak pressures between the Ambu AuraGain and the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Supreme.

Detailed description

The goal of this prospective randomized study is to compare whether there is a clinically relevant difference in airway leak pressures between the Ambu AuraGain (sizes 1.5 and 2) and the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Supreme. Parameters of clinical relevance such as insertion success rates, fiberoptic view of the glottic opening, ease and speed of gastric tube placement, airway stability, and peri-operative complications will also be assessed.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEAmbu AuraGain (size 1.5 or size 2.0)The device will be inserted and timed. A leak pressure test will be performed after successful insertion and after 10 minutes. The larynx will be visualized by placing a fiberoptic bronchoscope through the device. A gastric tube will be inserted through the device and timed.
DEVICELMA Supreme (size 1.5 or size 2.0)The device will be inserted and timed. A leak pressure test will be performed after successful insertion and after 10 minutes. The larynx will be visualized by placing a fiberoptic bronchoscope through the device. A gastric tube will be inserted through the device and timed.

Timeline

Start date
2015-03-01
Primary completion
2015-06-01
Completion
2015-06-01
First posted
2015-03-05
Last updated
2015-07-20

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02380768. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.