Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02378584
Natural Cycle Versus Endometrial Preparation for Healthy Blastocyst Transfer
The Clinical Results After Frozen-thawed Healthy Blastocyst Transfer in Natural Cycle Versus Cycle With Endometrial Preparation
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 236 (actual)
- Sponsor
- European Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 20 Years – 42 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study evaluates the difference in pregnancy rate transferring a healthy blastocyst in natural or artificial cycle.
Detailed description
The aim of the study was to verify the implantation capacity and ongoing pregnancy rate of vitrified warmed euploid blastocyst in natural cycle versus endometrial artificial cycle with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH-agonist) pituitary suppression.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | embryo transfer | healthy blastocyst transfer in natural and hormonal cycle |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2015-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2015-07-01
- Completion
- 2015-09-01
- First posted
- 2015-03-04
- Last updated
- 2016-01-28
Locations
2 sites across 1 country: Italy
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02378584. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.