Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT02336035
Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Over 65 Years, Operation or Cast?
Unstable Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Over 65 Years. Conservative Treatment With Cast Immobilization Versus Volar Locking Plate. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 100 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Oslo University Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 65 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Eligible patients that sign an informed consent will be randomized to operation with volar locking plate or cast immobilization. Primary follow-up after 1 year.
Detailed description
The investigators want to investigate if there is a difference between operative treatment with volar locking plates and cast immobilization in patient above 65 years with unstable distal radius fractures AO/OTA type A and C . Eligible patients that meets the radiological criteria (see inclusion criteria) will be randomized to cast immobilization or operation with volar locking plate. The investigators are planning a non-inferiority design. The current study will test the following null hypothesis: In patients over 65 years of age with unstable distal radius fractures AO/OTA type A and C,volar locking plates are superior to cast immobilization by more than 8 points, as evaluated by quick-DASH at 12 months follow-up. The investigators will perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing QALYs (Quality-adjusted life years) and costs with the two interventions the first year of follow-up.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Volar plate | Flexor carpi radialis (FCR)-approach. Standard surgical procedure with a volar locking plate |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2015-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2018-09-01
- Completion
- 2022-09-01
- First posted
- 2015-01-12
- Last updated
- 2021-09-10
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Norway
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02336035. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.