Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02314806
Gentamicin Versus Clindamycin Versus Normal Saline Lavage in Axilla
Effect of Gentamicin Versus Clindamycin Versus Normal Saline Lavage of the Axillary Surgical Bed After Lymph Node Dissection on Drainage Discharge Volume
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 51 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Hospital General Universitario Elche · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection were randomized into 3 groups: patients undergoing lavages with normal saline (Group 1), patients undergoing lavage gentamicin solution (Group 2) and patients undergoing lavage with a clindamycin solution (Group 3). Drainage volume discharge is investigated
Detailed description
The patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection were randomized into 3 groups: patients undergoing 2 lavages with 500 ml normal saline (Group 1), patients first undergoing lavage with 500 ml normal saline followed by a second lavage with a 500 ml of a gentamicin (240 mg) solution (Group 2) and patients first undergoing lavage with 500 ml normal saline followed by a second lavage with 500ml of a clindamycin (600mg) solution (Group 3). Drainage volume discharge is investigated
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Irrigation with gentamicin solution | The surgical bed is irrigated with a gentamicin solution |
| DRUG | Irrigation with Clindamycin solution | The surgical bed is irrigated with a clindamycin solution |
| DRUG | Irrigation with Normal saline | The surgical bed is irrigated with normal saline |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2013-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-12-01
- Completion
- 2014-12-01
- First posted
- 2014-12-11
- Last updated
- 2014-12-11
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02314806. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.