Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT02289651
Effectiveness of Pediatric Intubation
Comparison of the Venner(TM) A.P. Advance(TM) With the Macintosh Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation in a Standardized Airway Manikin With and Without Chest Compressions by Nurses. A Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial.
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 80 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- International Institute of Rescue Research and Education · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 65 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
We hypothesized that the Venner videolaryngoscope (A.P. Advance™) is beneficial for intubation of pediatric manikins while performing CPR. In the current study, we compared effectiveness of the Venner videolaryngoscope (A.P. Advance™) and MIL laryngoscopes in child resuscitation with and without CC.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Venner | Video-laryngoscopy |
| DEVICE | Miller | Direct-Laryngoscopy |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2014-11-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-12-01
- Completion
- 2014-12-01
- First posted
- 2014-11-13
- Last updated
- 2014-11-13
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Poland
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02289651. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.