Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT02286479

Comparison of Loop and Primary Incision&Drainage Techniques in the Emergency Department

Comparison of Loop Drainage and Primary Incision and Drainage Techniques in Patients With Cutaneous Abscess in the Emergency Department

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50 (actual)
Sponsor
Kocaeli University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Skin abscesses are among the most common soft tissue infections cause emergency room visits frequently. Management of abscess drainage and prevent further complications are important entities for emergency physicians. Historically primary incision and drainage (I\&D) technique has found very effective method of abscess drainage, however a novel technique loop drainage holds promising. The purpose of our study is comparison efficacy of I\&D and loop drainage techniques in patients with cutaneous abscess.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREIncision and DrainageIn the incision and drainage group, the abscesses are incised, irrigated by sterile solutions and drained conventionally.
PROCEDURELoop drainageIn the loop drainage group, two small incision are made on each side of abscess. The pus are drained and septations are seperated by a forceps. Abscess cavitary irrigated by sterile solution. Sterile, non-powder, non-latex surgical gloves cuff is inserted in one incision and taken out from the other insicion. Then two tips of cuff are tied loosely.

Timeline

Start date
2014-10-01
Primary completion
2016-08-01
Completion
2016-08-01
First posted
2014-11-07
Last updated
2016-08-15

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02286479. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.