Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02281656
Prospective Evaluation of Reverse End to Side Anterior Interosseous Nerve to Ulnar Nerve Transfer for Severe Compressive Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 40 (actual)
- Sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Ulnar nerve compression at the elbow is a common problem and can significantly affect hand function in severe cases. The current, standard treatment is Ulnar nerve decompression with or without transposition (moving the ulnar nerve to a site where there is less compression). In severe compression, the clinical results after this surgery are typically poor. Distal transfers of functioning nerves (at the level of the wrist) to the compressed ulnar nerve (anterior interosseous nerve to ulnar motor fascicles) have been suggested to "supercharge" or augment hand muscles while nerve axons regenerate from the level of the elbow after decompression/transposition. In fact, this treatment is becoming widely adopted without clear evidence that it changes outcomes. The investigators propose to prospectively compare the effectiveness of ulnar nerve decompression/transposition versus decompression/transposition and distal nerve transfer.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare the outcomes of patients with severe (intrinsic hand muscle dysfunction) compressive ulnar neuropathy at the elbow treated with ulnar nerve decompression and subcutaneous transposition alone versus ulnar nerve decompression with subcutaneous transposition and AIN to ulnar nerve reverse end-to-side transfer. The study objectives of this project are the following: 1. To prospectively compare the clinical outcomes of patients with severe ulnar neuropathy at the elbow who receive ulnar nerve decompression with subcutaneous transposition and AIN to ulnar motor reverse end-to-side nerve transfer versus decompression and subcutaneous transposition alone. 2. To prospectively compare the electrophysiologic outcomes (nerve conduction studies and EMG) of patients with severe ulnar neuropathy at the elbow who receive ulnar nerve decompression with subcutaneous transposition and AIN to ulnar motor reverse end-to-side nerve transfer versus decompression and subcutaneous transposition alone.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Surgery:ulnar nerve transposition with AIN to ulnar nerve transfer | |
| PROCEDURE | Surgery:ulnar nerve subcutaneous transposition without AIN to ulnar nerve transfer. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2015-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2015-10-01
- Completion
- 2016-10-01
- First posted
- 2014-11-03
- Last updated
- 2018-11-06
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02281656. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.