NCT02278666

Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: a Long Term Registry

Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: a Long Term Registry on Potential Benefits of the Different Surgical Techniques

• Status: Completed
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 1,000 (actual)
• Sponsor: Maria Cecilia Hospital · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The aim of the present study is to assess in a "real life" case list the outcome of three different surgical approaches for isolated aortic valve surgery in terms of surgery times, morbidity and mortality.

Detailed description

The study will focus on data recorded and collected from daily clinical treatment of patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement due to symptomatic aortic stenosis who consented to the use of their personal data. After surgery patients will be followed up to a minimum of 12 months. In-hospital and follow-up outcomes of the different surgical approaches will be analysed.

Conditions

• Aortic Valve Surgery

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	aortic valve replacement	aortic valve replacement with either biological prosthetic valve or mechanical valve
DEVICE	biological prosthetic valve	aortic valve replacement with either biological prosthetic valve or mechanical valve
DEVICE	Mechanical valve	aortic valve replacement with either biological prosthetic valve or mechanical valve

Timeline

• Start date: 2014-10-01
• Primary completion: 2022-11-01
• Completion: 2022-12-01
• First posted: 2014-10-30
• Last updated: 2023-09-13

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Italy